[The excerpt below is from the section of the article that pertains to the Baha’i Faith]



[Newspaper:] The Washington Times

[Date:] Friday, 1 June 1984



Protesting Iran's extermination of Baha'is

Muhammad Tahir's May 21 letter, "Excluding Baha'is in Iran," attempts to legitimize Iran's persecution of Baha'is by repeating tired charges long discredited by informed observers. The day following his letter, for example, the U.S. Congress passed a joint resolution condemning Iran for its brutal and unjustifiable efforts to exterminate the Baha'is.

Rep. John E. Porter explained that the Baha'i religion incorporates "the essential tenets of all organized religions and emphasizes the unity of mankind, world peace, world order, the social equality of all people, pacifism, and tolerance." Rep. James Leach explained that the "acts of inhumanity and brutality that have been heaped upon members of a peaceful religion are incomprehensible to civilized humanity," and are reminiscent of Germany under Hitler.

Iran's religious genocide is often disguised with spurious charges against the Baha'is, who are then given the choice of being spared execution, and having all charges dropped, if they recant their faith. Iran's authorities know that contrary to the charges, Iran's Baha'is are loyal, peaceful, and wish only to be permitted to worship in freedom.

Baha'is are sustained through this suffering by our belief in God and our belief that – in the words of a Baha'i prayer – the people of all faiths will "let the religions agree…so that they may see each other as one family and the whole earth as one home."

Paul Glist

Baha'i Washington Information Officer


Is Muhammad Tahir for real? After calling Iran's persecution of the Baha'is "alleged," he proceeds to explain why they deserve to be persecuted: their religion is "unlike the long established religions of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam."

One then would suppose that the Islamic Republic of Iran would be better disposed towards these "long established" faiths. Now we do not expect Mr. Tahir to take seriously the harmless minority of Episcopalians in Iran, but they too have been persecuted. At least one priest has been martyred, the bishop's son murdered, rectories invaded by civil authorities. The bishop is in exile, churches closed, schools, and hospitals confiscated. So much for Iranian regard for the "long established" religions.

It is not simply Baha'ism that incurs the vicious hostility of these unenlightened successors of the Shah, but the fact that they are reactionary fanatics who neither respect the rights of other faiths nor the manner of civilized peoples.

Edmund W. Olifiers Jr.

St. Boniface's Episcopal Church

Lindenhurst, N.Y.

For Muhammad Tahir's information, though Judeo-Christian tradition may have influenced the writers of the Constitution, the laws of the land are certainly not based on the revealed law of God nor on the Bible. As explained by one of its authors, Thomas Jefferson, they are based on the separation of church and state.

Though not a Baha'i, I can not subscribe to the genocidal killings of Baha'is, or Jews. I would also like to suggest to Mr. Tahir that not all Moslems believe in or approve of the establishment of a theocratic state (and justifiably so, as the turn of events has amply shown, "By their works ye shall know them").

Presently in Iran, over 75 percent of the religious and fully 90 percent of the secular people are opposed to the regime.

I, myself a former Moslem, have, after the inhuman excesses of the ayatollahs, reverted back to Zoroastrianism, the ancient religion of Iran. Only in this noble religion can I seek out my heritage, culture, music, and art – most of which has been banned by the fundamentalist ayatollahs.

Mohammad Hossein Azadi

Bethesda, Md.














[The content above was transcribed from the original document. If you find any typographic error, kindly email us using the 'Contact' page form.]