[PROVISIONAL TRANSLATION FROM PERSIAN]

 

[Translator’s notes appear in square brackets]

[Personal information has been redacted.]

 

Do not follow your own desires, lest you deviate [Quran 4:135]

[Emblem]

Public Prosecutor’s Office, Islamic Republic of Iran

Judgement

Court: ------

 

Date: ------

Number: ------

Attachment: ------

 

Legal

Date: 28 Mordad 1396 [19 August 2017]

Case reference: 807/54/95

Judgement number: 133

Investigating authority: Branch 54, Provincial Court of Appeals of Tehran, Special for Article 49 of the Constitution

Appellants: 1- Siamak Iraninejad, 2- Rayyan Iraninejad, 3- Sharareh Farrokhzadi, represented by Mr. Ahmad Fatemi, with address: Tehran, Vali Asr “God hasten His time of coming” Avenue - across from Fatemi - Abdeh Street - Number 55 - Unit 13.

Defendant: Division in Charge of Execution of Imam [Khomeini’s] Order – Address: Tehran- Khaled Eslamboli Avenue – across from Vali-Asr “God hasten His time of coming” Avenue, 2nd Floor – Office of Court Affairs

Subject of appeal: Judgement number 950458, dated 15 Shahrivar 1395 [5 September 2016], Special Islamic Revolutionary Court for Article 49 of the Constitution [G-A], Branch 6, Tehran

 

Procedural Synopsis

Upon receipt of the file and its recording under the case reference above, with observance of legal procedures during the special session, the Court meeting was convened under the supervision of the undersigned individuals.  The committee, upon reviewing the contents of the file, announces the completion of its investigation and, beseeching God’s help, and with reliance upon its legal conscience during its deliberations, hereby issues its decision.

 

Decision of the Court

Regarding the objection and appeal by Siamak and Rayyan Iraninejad and Sharareh Farrokhzadi as to Judgement number 950458, dated 15 Shahrivar 1395 [5 September 2016] issued by the Special Court for Article 49 of the Constitution, Branch 6, Tehran, on the basis of which the defendant’s claim against the appealing parties and Sirous Iraninejad has determined what must be done with the assets of the aforementioned individuals—and in view of the report of the Ministry of Intelligence and the certainty that the aforementioned individuals are Baha’is and are active members of the perverse  Baha’i sect—and for implementation of Article 11 of the By-Laws on how to handle the case of Article 49 of the Constitution, an order has been issued for confiscation of the assets of the aforementioned individuals, with the exception of a house and its furnishings, for the benefit of the Division in Charge [Execution of  Imam Khomeini’s Order]. Upon review of the contents of the file and the bill of appeal submitted by the appellant, and given that they have not presented a legitimate shortcoming or problem that would, according to the sections listed in Article 348 of the Civil Procedure Code for the Public and Revolutionary Courts, cause the issued judgement to be voided or require further review, and given that most of the content in the bill of appeal is a repetition of the original points, we find the judgement to be completely free from legal shortcomings or defects.  Therefore, this Court, with reliance upon Article 358 of the aforementioned law and the amendment to the by-laws on how to handle the case related to Article 49 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, rejects the submitted appeal and fully affirms the judgement issued by the defendant. This decision, with reliance upon Article 365 of the same Law, is final. 05GO43

Head of Branch 45, Appellate Court of Tehran Province

Hasan Babaie

[Signature]

Clerk of Branch 45, Appellate Court of Tehran Province

Ebrahimi

[Signature]

Fani, 28 Shahrivar 1396 [19 September 2017]

[Official Stamp]

Copy—the photocopy is the same as the original

Branch 45, Appellate Court of Tehran Province

[Handwritten note on top of the page] 17